An appeal to the European Commission and the European Parliament about necessary measures for the international protection of Russian conscientious objectors, deserters and those who surrendered or were captured

The Russian President’s Decree No. 647 of 21.09.2022 “On declaring partial mobilisation in the Russian Federation” effectively deprived servicemen of the possibility to leave military service of their own will while mobilised or under contract. Now they are forced to remain at the front and fight until they are either killed or seriously injured, or until they reach the age limit for military service, or they commit a crime for which they are punishable by imprisonment.

Federal law No. 365-FZ of 24.09.2022 “On amendments to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and to Article 151 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation,” in turn, introduced criminal liability for voluntary surrender and toughened liability for the voluntary abandonment of units and failure to comply with orders. Thus, on the legislative level there are serious obstacles to refusing to participate in the hostilities and exercising the constitutional right to conscientious objection to military service.

The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation enshrined a stricter law enforcement practice in relation to those who surrender. The resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 11 of 18.05.2023 effectively introduces a presumption of guilt for those who have been taken prisoner.

Another cause for concern are the recent amendments to the federal laws “On military duty and military service” and “On the procedure for exiting and entering the Russian Federation,” which introduce an extrajudicial temporary restriction on leaving the country for conscripts, the confiscation of foreign passports from citizens called up for military service, as well as other restrictions for failure to appear when summoned to the military registration office: a ban on driving vehicles, registering property and financial transactions among others.

Vladimir Putin’s regime has thus established mechanisms to persecute those Russian citizens who refuse to participate in the full-scale invasion of Ukraine and the combat operations on its territory, who try to exercise the right to conscientious objection to military service and who desert or surrender. In effect, this means that the regime has the legal possibility to forcibly send large numbers of Russian citizens to a criminal war at any time.

Obviously, one of the most reliable ways to protect oneself from being sent to war is to leave Russia and travel to safe countries. However, emigration is an extremely complicated process: land borders with EU countries are effectively closed and the simplified visa procedure has been abolished. There are no general guidelines for the protection of conscientious objectors, deserters, people who voluntarily surrender or prisoners of war.

In view of the above, we, the undersigned anti-war initiatives, call on the European Commission and the European Parliament within the framework of their respective mandates and in cooperation with Russian and international human rights and humanitarian organisations to:

1. Consider recognising Russia’s war against Ukraine as a crime against peace to clarify the humanitarian status of Russian conscientious objectors and deserters who, as part of their right to freedom of conscience, refuse to participate in the criminal war.

2. Develop and adopt a unified approach to the provision of international protection for Russian citizens who are under threat of criminal prosecution or are prosecuted for exercising their right to conscientious objection to military service.

3. Develop and adopt a unified approach to the provision of international protection for Russian citizens who were mobilised, conscripted or were serving in the military under contract and were sent to perform military service in military units or in a combat zone on the territory of Ukraine and who:

— declared their refusal to participate in combat operations, to carry out orders related to combat operations against Ukraine, left the place of service (deserted) and are under threat of criminal prosecution or are being criminally prosecuted;

— voluntarily surrendered to the AFU or are already held as POWs, have declared their disagreement with Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine, refuse to return to Russia because they may be criminally prosecuted by the Russian authorities, and are ready to cooperate with the state authorities of European countries and international justice bodies and testify about war crimes committed by the Russian Armed Forces.

4. Develop common guidelines for establishing suitable visa procedures or travel documents for the above categories of Russian citizens for the purpose of their transit to EU countries that are willing to provide them with international protection, including:

— consider adopting common guidelines for a broader application of humanitarian visas and extending the eligibility criteria to the above categories of Russian citizens;

— consider adopting common guidelines on accepting asylum applications from the above categories of Russian citizens at embassies and consulates of EU countries in third countries;

— consider adopting common guidelines on issuing job-seeker visas in the embassies and consulates of EU states in third countries for the legal migration of qualified personnel from the above categories of Russian citizens.

5. Develop mechanisms for providing support, including consulting and financial support, to specialised organisations and initiatives that specialise in evacuating from Russia, creating a network of shelters, legal assistance and other measures to support the above categories of Russian citizens in Russia and third countries.

6. Develop mechanisms to provide financial and humanitarian support to third countries that host a significant number of Russian citizens from the above categories, as well as those who are hiding from conscription and mobilisation, in order to enhance the capacity of these countries to accept and integrate these individuals.

Estimation of the number of those who will need international protection

According to the independent Russian media outlet Mediazona, since the announcement of mobilisation in autumn 2022 until May 2023, around 1500 cases against servicemen were submitted to Russian garrison military courts, consisting of: 1347 cases of unauthorised abandonment of a military unit, 81 cases of not following orders and 26 cases of desertion.

According to estimates from Russian human rights activists, the number of deserters needing international protection should not exceed 1500 people per year. The number of citizens drafted for compulsory military service and who apply for alternative civilian service does not exceed 1500 per year, of which about 47% of applications are rejected. Neither the number of applications nor the percentage of refusals for those mobilised is known.

It should also be taken into account that not all conscientious objectors and deserters who encounter violations of their rights and/or are persecuted will want or be able to leave Russia in search of international protection. Often personal circumstances – financial, family and other – will prevent this. In addition, some refugees will prefer to remain in third countries and will not go to the EU.

As a result, our preliminary estimate of the number of citizens who would need protection under our proposals (excluding prisoners, about whom we have no information) is no more than 2000 to 3000 people per year.

We, Russian anti-war, human rights and humanitarian initiatives, human rights defenders and activists, are ready to cooperate with EU authorities in order to develop a universal and effective approach to the above-mentioned issues. We are also ready to help with the processes of verification, consultation and the development and dissemination of guidelines for those who are fleeing from mobilisation and conscription.

With regards to this, we propose that the European Parliament and European Commission create special working and contact groups, where, with the participation of Russian anti-war human rights and humanitarian initiatives, they could develop concrete steps and solutions to implement the points outlined in our appeal. We are convinced that it is indeed only through joint efforts that we will be able to save as many lives as possible on both sides of the front.

Signatories:

  1. The Youth Democratic Movement Vesna (Russia)
  2. The Anti-War Project Idite lesom (Russia)
  3. The Autonomous Non-Profit Human Rights Organisation Shkola Prizyvnika (Russia)
  4. The Initiative Demokrati-JA (Germany)
  5. The Movement of Conscientious Objectors (Russia)
  6. The ‘Political Prisoners. Memorial’ human rights project
  7. Austausch, for the European Civil Society (Germany)
  8. The Sakharov Movement Mir, Progress, Prava Cheloveka (Russia)
  9. The Project Tochka [Ne]vozvrata
  10. inTransit, the Berlin Anti-War Initiative (Germany)
  11. The Board of FreeRussiaNL (the Netherlands)
  12. The Hub for Humanitarian Projects Reshim.org
  13. Russland hinter Gittern e.V. (Germany)
  14. Frame, the Civic Education Initiative
  15. The Association of Free Russians (Spain)
  16. The Ark
  17. The French Association Russie-Libertés (France)
  18. Ksenia Maximova, the Founder of the Russian Democratic Society (The UK)
  19. Russi contro la guerra (Italy)
  20. WOT Foundation (Poland)
  21. Free Russians e.V. (Germany)
  22. The Online Magazine Shveitsariya dlya vsekh (Switzerland)
  23. Inna Berezkina, School of Civic Education
  24. The Russian Democratic Society (Serbia)
  25. SmåRådina, for the Democratic Russia (Norway)
  26. Russian Canadian Democratic Alliance (Canada)
  27. The Democratic Community of Russian Speakers in Finland (Finland)
  28. Media Partizany (Russia)
  29. Krakow for Free Russia (Poland)
  30. Russland der Zukunft — Schweiz
  31. Russians Against War — Vienna
  32. Free Russians Ireland
  33. Mariia Solenova, Všį Action4life
  34. The Finnish Union of Conscientious Objectors Aseistakieltäytyjäliitto (Finland)
  35. Conscience and Peace Tax International
  36. Antimilitaristes-MOC València (Spain)
  37. Movimento Nonviolento (Italy)
  38. International Centre for civil initiatives “Our House”, Belarus & Lithuania
  39. Antimilitaristische Aktion Berlin (Germany)
  40. European Bureau for Conscientious Objection (EBCO)
  41. Connection e.V. (Germany)
  42. Pax Christi Flanders (Belgium)
  43. War Resisters’ International (WRI)
  44. Internationale der Kriegsdienstgegner*innen (IDK e.V. Berlin/Germany)
  45. Movimento Internazionale della Riconciliazione (M.I.R. Italia)
  46. Pax christi — deutsche Sektion (Germany)
  47. Conscientious Objection Watch (Turkey)
  48. Deutsche Friedensgesellschaft — Vereinigte KriegsdienstgegnerInnen (DFG-VK, Germany)
  49. Bund für Soziale Verteidigung (BSV) (Germany)
  50. Arbeitskreis Asyl Tribsees (Germany)
  51. National Association Victims of NS-Military-Justice e.V. (Germany)
  52. Komitee für Grundrechte und Demokratie (Germany)
  53. Church and Peace e.V. — Ecumenical peace church network in Europe (Germany)
  54. German Mennonite Peace Committee (DMFK, Germany)
  55. Vredesbeweging Pais (Peace movement Pais) (The Netherlands)
  56. Stichting voor Actieve Geweldloosheid (The Netherlands)
  57. Mennonite Peace Centre Berlin (Germany)
  58. ACAT Germany (Action by Christians for the Abolition of Torture)
  59. Federal Association of Vietnamese Refugees in the Federal Republic of Germany
  60. IPPNW Germany – Internationale Ärzt*innen für die Verhütung des Atomkrieges – Ärzt*innen in sozialer Verantwortung e.V. (Germany)
  61. ACAT Belgium
  62. Evangelische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Kriegsdienstverweigerung und Frieden (EAK) (Germany)
  63. Aktionsgemeinschaft Dienst für den Frieden (AGDF) (Germany)
  64. Museum voor Vrede en Geweldloosheid
  65. Vereniging Kerk en Vrede (The Netherlands)
  66. Kooperation für den Frieden (Germany)
  67. Feminist Anti-war Resistance
  68. Comunità dei Russi Liberi (Italy)
  69. Frame (Tbilisi)
  70. Anti-war committee in Sweden
  71. Maria Beple, designer
  72. Freies Russland NRW
  73. Conflict Intelligence Team
  74. Loimaa Against War, Loimaa, Finland
  75. Catalan peace organization ,FundiPau (Fundació per la Pau)
  76. Journal Graswurzelrevolution, Germany
  77. Société Religieuse des Amis (Quaker) Assemblée de France
  78. Journal de l’émigration antiguerre russophone “Côte de la Paix”
  79. Антивоенный Больничный (Anti-war sick leave)
  80. Mouvement Internationale de la Réconciliation – MIR France
  81. Federation for social Defence/Bund für soziale Verteidigung – BSV (Germany)
  82. Flüchtlingsrat Baden-Württemberg e.V.
  83. Workshop for Nonviolent Action/Werkstatt für Gewaltfreie Aktion (Germany)
  84. Heidelberger Friedensratschlag – Netzwerk Friedenskooperative (Germany)
  85. Anti-war movement of Russians in Korea “Voices In Korea”
  86. Anti-war Kaluga
  87. Association For Free Russia in Bulgaria
  88. Territory of Peace and Kindness (Территория Мира и Добра)
  89. Alliance Queer of Russia
  90. Omsk Civil Association (Omsk region, Russia)
  91. KRES Poliskola (Riga, Latvia)
Scroll to Top